On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 09:23:14 +0600, Donald Gaminitillake
<Donald Gaminitillake> wrote:
>
> You got scared of a ghost!!!! :-X
:-p
> I proved certain errors of SLS 1134.
I didn't see a proof though... Perhaps I may have missed something:
>
> Please sit back and read the following sentences written by you.
>
> > This I understand now, because of the presense of
> > all the characters, including the modified ones.
What I meant was that *if* all the characters are present (notice the *if*) sorting works perfectly. But I didn't mean that the present system does *NOT* work!
> > Voice to text and OCR have been looked at, but not SMS.
> > If the rest of the characters are *missing*, then it would have been a
> > real problem. But as the rest of the characters are only *hidden*
So I said the rest of the characters are *NOT* missing, but somewhat
*hidden* in the SLS 1134 standard, and it by no means is an *error*
IMHO.!
> What more one need to prove that SLS 1134 needs modification & correction
As far as the GNU/Linux implementation is converned, we don't need modifications nor corrections.
> I know Mr Harshula understand the problem.
Harshula, can you express your views on this regard?
Anuradha
-- http://www.linux.lk/~anuradha/ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.htmlReceived on Sat Dec 4 14:04:45 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 08 2004 - 17:56:45 LKT